Baltimore Ravens vs New York Giants Player Stats & Game Recap (Dec 15 2024)

The Baltimore Ravens vs New York Giants participant stats for the Dec 15, 2024, matchup tell a clear tale: dominance by the Ravens, and a Giants team that couldn’t hold up. The very last score read 35-14, and you’ll see throughout how the numbers lower back up the narrative.

Game Snapshot & Final Score

Let’s start with what matters: in this Ravens vs Giants matchup, the Ravens came out strong. They led 35 to 14 in East Rutherford at the New York Giants’ home field. 

The key takeaway? The Ravens didn’t just win, they controlled the flow of the game, and when you dig into the player stats and box score, you’ll see they left very little to chance.

Full Box Score (table)

Here’s a detailed look at important team totals and leading individual numbers (for a full Ravens vs Giants box score and Ravens vs Giants player stats, you’ll want to save a copy of this for reference):

Some numbers are rounded/approximate from multiple sources.

What jumps out? High efficiency from Jackson (21 of 25, 5 TDs) and a huge gap in total yardage. The Giants simply didn’t keep pace.

Top Player Performances & Highlight Plays

When you’re looking at Ravens vs Giants player stats and attempting to find what describes the game, a few names stand out:

• Lamar Jackson: 21/25 passing, 290 yards, 5 TDs. He turned into in overall manager. One of the uncommon instances you notice a QB throw more touchdowns than incompletions.
• Rashod Bateman: With only three receptions, he collected around eighty yards and 2 TDs. A reminder that in this sport, large performances counted.
• Mark Andrews: His 13-yard TD from Jackson became his allowance’s say milestone moment; he became the Ravens’ all-time franchise chief in receiving touchdowns.
• Malik Nabers: For the Giants, his 10 catches for 82 yards and a TD have been one of the few bright spots. He’s a rookie doing his high-quality in a tough season.

And there were highlight plays: a 49-yard scoring pass to Bateman, a 21-yard TD to Devontez Walker, and the Giants’ bit of hope when Boyle threw a 23-yard TD to Nabers in the 4th. It’s those moments, paired with efficient execution, that turn stats into dominance.

Third-Down, Red-Zone & Situational Stats

1. Red-Zone Execution

The Ravens didn’t waste their red-zone trips every time they crossed the 20; you could almost feel a scoring drive coming. The Giants had multiple possibilities too, particularly after short-discipline setups or 4th-down conversions, but they just couldn’t end the one drives. That loss of red-zone punch really shows up within the very last score.

2. Third-Down Success

If you look at the third-down numbers, the difference is honestly huge. Baltimore hovered around 82%, which is unreal efficiency in the National Football League (NFL). The Giants sat closer to 17%, and when you’re going 3-and-out that often, your defense ends up stuck on the field way too long.

3. Quarter-by-Quarter Flow

The scoring rhythm says a lot. The Ravens had been consistent 7 factors in the first, 14 within the 2d, then 7 and seven to close it out. Meanwhile, the Giants’ simplest discovered the end region inside the 2d and fourth quarters. It by no means genuinely felt like they had been constructing momentum.

4. Turnovers & Penalties

The Giants’ QB switch, DeVito leaving with a concussion, and Boyle stepping in, threw their offense off rhythm. Add a couple of costly penalties and the Ravens’ pressure up front, and Baltimore kept stealing the momentum back.

5. Why It Mattered

When you stack all of this together, it’s pretty obvious: Baltimore didn’t just rack up yards; they won the moments that actually decide games. Timing, execution, and composure. That’s what separated the two teams on this one.

Also Read: Alaska PFD Program Stimulus Payment 2025: Who Gets It, How Much, and Key Updates

Head-to-Head & Historical Context

The Ravens vs. Giants matchup has had plenty of memorable moments over the years, but this one absolutely stands out. The Giants’ loss marked their ninth straight defeat, tying a franchise record, while the Ravens moved up to 9–five and strengthened their playoff chances. 

Lamar Jackson’s 21/25, 290-yard, 5-TD overall performance changed into easily considered one of his greatest against any single opponent. And with the Giants sitting at zero–8 at MetLife this season, the home struggles have already been part of the story. Put all that together, and you may see why this sport felt so lopsided. Baltimore didn’t simply win; they took advantage of a team already on the ropes.

Key Injuries, Lineup Changes & Defensive Notes

This one’s not just about the offensive stats; what happened behind the scenes or on the other side of the ball helps explain why the Ravens vs Giants player stats look the way they do.

• For the Giants: Starting QB Tommy DeVito left with a concussion, and backup Tim Boyle took over. That instability at QB matters.
• The Giants had multiple offensive line/injury problems (e.g., tackle and guard injuries). That affects pass protection, rush lanes, and thus stats across offense/defense.
• For the Ravens, their defense applied consistent pressure, and the offense took advantage. The 5 sacks, QB hits, and forced third-downs show up in the numbers.
• On special teams, one note, the Ravens’ return game set up short fields and quick scores (which affects player stats indirectly).

What This Means For Each Team Moving Forward

Now that we’ve dissected the stats, what do they imply?

• For the Ravens: This game tells you they’re serious contenders. The efficient passing, dynamic receiving (Bateman + Andrews), and solid rushing show a well-rounded attack. If they keep this up, their playoff resilience gets a boost.
• For the Giants: The stats suggest deeper issues. Inability to convert third-downs, instability at QB, and defensive breakdowns. If you’re a Giants fan, you’d ask: what changes now?
• For fantasy/betting: If you saw these stats coming, you might have started Bateman, trusted Jackson, and avoided Giants skill players this week. In future matchups, looking at “player grades vs opponent” becomes important.
• Next games: Watching how both teams adjust will be interesting. Can the Giants shore up the third-down and turnover issue? Can the Ravens maintain their efficient pace? The box score says “yes so far” for Baltimore.

FAQs

Q: Who had the most receiving yards in Ravens vs Giants?

A: For Baltimore, it was Bateman (~80 yards), for New York, it changed into Nabers (82 yards).

Q: How many touchdowns did Lamar Jackson throw vs the Giants?

A: Five. 21/25 passing, 290 yards, five TDs

Q: What becomes the biggest play of the sport?

A: Jackson’s 49-yard TD skip to Bateman early within the second quarter that gave Baltimore separation.

Q: What was the final rating and general yardage?

A: Ravens 35, Giants 14; Ravens ~445 yards, Giants ~236 yards.

Conclusion

Suppose you take away one thing from these Baltimore Ravens vs New York Giants player stats. In that case, it’s this: when a team executes at a high level in multiple phases (passing, rushing, receiving, situational), the outcome follows. The Ravens did exactly that.